Katie Hopkins loses High Court case to Jack Monroe, judicial judgement in full
The judge presiding over the case has included a detailed discussion of 'how Twitter works'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Katie Hopkins has lost a historic High Court case to poverty campaigner and food blogger Jack Monroe.
Monroe won £24,000 in damages in a libel action against the MailOnline columnist after Hopkins implied Monroe had defaced or vandalised war memorials.
In the High Court's judicial judgement, the judge, Mr Justice Warby referred to Hopkins as a "rentagob".
The meticulous judgement also details the machinations of Twitter interactions.
Read the full report here:
Monroe said: “It’s taken 21 months but today the High Court ruled that Hopkins statements to/about me were defamatory. I sued her for libel. and I won.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments