Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Junior doctors lose high court challenge over Jeremy Hunt’s seven-day contract

The Health Secretary wins his case against doctors who say the contract is ‘unsafe and unsustainable’

Harriet Agerholm
Wednesday 28 September 2016 15:53 BST
Comments
Judge ruled that although Mr Hunt had approved the contract, he had not compelled employers to enforce it
Judge ruled that although Mr Hunt had approved the contract, he had not compelled employers to enforce it (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Junior doctors have lost their High Court case against their new staffing contract one week before it is to be imposed on them.

Justice for Health argued the contract was “unsafe and unsustainable” – a statement the Department for Health disputed.

The doctors’ group said Mr Hunt had exceeded his powers by enforcing the new contract.

They claimed the Health Secretary had acted irrationally and had not fulfilled his obligations to act with transparency, certainty and clarity.

But Mr Justice Green rejected the claims. Although Mr Hunt had approved the contract, he had not compelled employers to enforce it, he ruled.

A spokesperson from the Department of Health said: “We welcome this clear decision by the judge that the secretary of state acted entirely lawfully.

“We must now move on from this dispute to the crucial job of making sure patients get the same high standards of urgent and emergency care every day of the week, which involves more than the junior doctors’ contract.

“We urge the BMA to remove all threat of further industrial action so we can work constructively with junior doctors to address their wider concerns and better recognise their vital importance to the NHS.”

Six separate strikes have been conducted by junior doctors over the contract so far – but a series of five-day strikes running up to Christmas have been called off because of fears over patient safety.

Dr Ben White, a medical registrar and one of the five founding members of Justice for Health told Press Association: “The key points of the judgment are: Mr Hunt is not imposing a contract, he never was, he never meant to suggest he was and he claims no one ever thought he was.

“I think what has happened is a re-writing of British history.

“What we have seen him do is political game-playing over NHS patients, that is how junior doctors feel as NHS staff.”

The legal challenge had been crowdfunded from about 10,000 donors, who raised £300,000 for the cause.

The Department of Health said they would seek to recoup the costs the taxpayer had paid as a result of the case.

In response to the ruling, Lib Dem Health Secretary Norman Lamb said: “The government may have won the battle in court today, but it is far from winning the war.

“Ultimately, Jeremy Hunt is still making the mistake of trying to squeeze more and more out of our cash-strapped NHS, without any plan to fund these changes and ensure vital staff do not leave.

“I have called on him many times to launch a cross-party commission to review NHS and care funding, so we can ensure a fair deal to both patients and staff in the years to come.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in