Judge reprimanded after accessing records relating to criminal case in which family member was a potential witness
Karen Holt’s actions amounted to serious misconduct, says judicial investigations office
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A judge has been reprimanded by judicial heads after accessing records relating to a case in which a family member was a potential witness.
Staff at the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO), which investigates judges and magistrates, said judicial heads have concluded that Judge Karen Holt’s actions amounted to serious misconduct.
A spokesman for the office said Judge Holt, who sits at Isleworth Crown Court, has been reprimanded.
Judge Holt had been charged with an offence under computer misuse legislation.
She had been accused of illegally accessing the digital file of a criminal case in which her daughter was a witness.
But a more senior judge dismissed the case against her at a hearing in Southwark Crown Court in June.
Mr Justice Davis said there was insufficient evidence that her actions were unauthorised.
He had heard that Judge Holt had two years ago browsed documents relating to a music teacher facing trial at Guildford Crown Court following child sex allegations.
The JCIO spokesman said: “Her Honour Judge Karen Holt was the subject of a disciplinary investigation after she accessed digital records relating to a criminal case in which a family member was a potential witness.
“The judge also sent an email to the police, part of which risked being seen as an attempt to influence the conduct of the case.
“While accepting that the judge did not make improper use of the information she briefly viewed, and that her email had no influence on the case, the Lord Chancellor and the Lord Chief Justice concluded that Judge Holt’s actions amounted to serious misconduct and have reprimanded her.”
Press Association
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.