Think tank reveals who are the biggest losers after Jeremy Hunt’s Budget
The Resolution Foundation said the Chancellor threw ‘fiscal caution to the wind’.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Pensioners are the big losers from Jeremy Hunt’s Budget amid falling living standards and stagnating growth, according to a think tank.
The Resolution Foundation’s analysis came after Wednesday’s budget left the door open for more pre-election financial giveaways after delivering another 2p cut in national insurance.
Mr Hunt spent around £10 billion on cutting national insurance, described by commentators as a move to “sweeten the Government’s electoral pitch” on top of a similar cut in November.
But the Resolution Foundation said the Budget threw “fiscal caution to the wind”, according to its chief executive Torsten Bell.
“A pre-election Budget produced another round of pre-election tax cuts,” he said. “Who could have seen that coming?
“To deliver them, the Chancellor has continued to throw fiscal caution to the wind, cutting his fiscal headroom to just a third of the average level seen since 2010.
“He would fail to meet three out of the four sets of fiscal rules used by his Conservative predecessors since 2010.”
The think tank said this is the first parliament in modern history set to see a fall in living standards with real household disposable income to fall by 0.9%.
Mr Bell said it has been a “frenetic few years” for tax policy with several rises and cuts in tax with middle earners coming out on top.
“The biggest group of losers are pensioners, who face an £8 billion collective hit,” Mr Bell added.
“Looking at all policy changes announced this parliament reinforces the sense that the Government has reversed course from the approach that dominated during the 2010s.
“This time it is those aged over 65 and on the highest incomes who are set to lose most.”
Mr Bell said while Budgets are a big day for Westminster, the “big picture” for Britain has not changed as it stays a nation where taxes rise and incomes “stagnate”.
“Big tax cuts may or may not affect the outcome of that election, but the task for whoever wins is huge,” he said.
“They will need to both wrestle with implausible spending cuts and also restart sustained economic growth – the only route to end Britain’s stagnation.”