Inflation-busting 22% 'pay-rise' for the Queen branded 'immoral' by campaigners after 'rainy day' fund is reduced to 'last £1 million'
Queen's 'rainy day' bank account is down to its last one million pounds, leaving her vulnerable to ‘unexpected costs’ claims National Audit Office
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.With an estimated wealth of £350m the Queen is not hard-up by anyone's measure.
According to figures in a National Audit Report yesterday, however, her 'rainy day' bank account is apparently down to its last one million pounds, leaving her vulnerable to ‘unexpected costs’.
Details of the Queen's finances emerged after the National Audit Office was allowed, for the first time, to examine all aspects of the Queen’s funding.
According to the report the Head-of-State is also set to receive an inflation-busting 22 per cent ‘pay rise’ over two years, raising the amount allocated to run her household and conduct official engagements to £37.9 million up from £31 million.
Despite freezing pay for all her staff earning over £50,000, the Queen paid out £19.5million in wages to her 436 staff last year. The average salary paid being £44,724-a-year.
The report says that the recommended increase in the grant is in the context of ‘significant reductions’ in the monarchy’s funding over the last 20 years. Grants for royal travel have been cut by 76% and the cost of maintenance for royal palaces was reduced by 60 per cent.
However, the decision to increase the funding allocated to the Queen was condemned by campaigners who branded it "immoral".
Graham Smith of the group, Republic, said: "We said from the start that the sovereign support grant was a bad deal for the taxpayers and no way to fund a public institution. Clearly we were right."
"While almost every other public body is facing serious cuts, it is quite simply immoral that our head of state is handed millions more in public money."
"The office of the head of state should be funded like every other public body - through a budget agreed by Parliament and based on need."
"The royals have got to be told: enough is enough."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments