Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Holocaust survivor tells court care home is like a Nazi camp and asks to be allowed to move to Israel

Woman features in first Court of Protection case to be staged in public following launch of open-justice pilot scheme

Matthew Moore
Tuesday 09 February 2016 20:11 GMT
Comments
At least six million Jews are believed to have died in the Holocaust, mostly in camps - as depicted in this 1948 film
At least six million Jews are believed to have died in the Holocaust, mostly in camps - as depicted in this 1948 film (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A Holocaust survivor who says that living in a care home reminds her of being a prisoner in a German concentration camp is at the centre of a court case after she asked to be allowed to move to Israel.

The woman, who is in her nineties and has dementia, features in the first Court of Protection case to be staged in public following the launch of an open-justice pilot scheme. The court deals with issues relating to sick and vulnerable people.

Council social services staff have asked a judge to make decisions about what is in the best interests of the woman, who was held in a German concentration camp during the Second World War.

District Judge Anselm Eldergill heard submissions from the woman’s daughter and from lawyers representing social services staff at a preliminary Court of Protection hearing in London.

Lee Parkhill, a barrister who represented the council involved, told the judge that the woman had vascular dementia, an acute kidney problem, diabetes and hearing difficulties. He said that she had been assessed last year as lacking the mental capacity to make decisions about where she lived and her care.

PM meets Holocaust survivors

Mr Parkhill said she had been admitted to hospital following a fall at home and then placed in a care home about two years ago. She had lived at home and her family thought that she couldn’t manage. Mr Parkhill indicated that a judge had earlier authorised the woman’s “deprivation of liberty” at the care home under the terms of mental capacity legislation. He said that authorisation was due for reconsideration later this year.

The woman had said “consistently” that she wanted to leave the care home, Mr Parkhill told the judge. She had made references to “feeling like a prisoner again in the German concentration camp” and just wanting to be “free from this place”, Judge Eldergill heard.

The woman’s daughter considered her mother’s “desire” to leave the care home to be an “unrealistic aim”, Mr Parkhill said. She thought that her mother was well cared for and should stay at the care home. She told the judge that her mother wanted to sell her home and go to Israel. The judge also heard that the woman wanted to be buried in Israel.

Judge Eldergill said he would have to decide whether the woman had the mental capacity to make decisions relating to leaving the care home and her wish to move overseas.

The judge said if he concluded that she lacked that capacity he would make decisions on her behalf. One possibility was that a hearing would be held at the care home where the woman lived – so she could have an involvement in proceedings.

The judge, who ruled that none of the people involved in the case could be identified, adjourned the hearing to a date to be fixed.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in