Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A prize draw for a £1 million house and fishing retreat was postponed today following legal advice from the Gambling Commission.
Brian and Wendy Wilshaw have sold 46,000 tickets at £25 each for the chance to win their home, the 11-acre Oldborough Fishing Retreat in Morchard Bishop, Devon.
They were due to draw the winner today but a statement on the competition's website said it was postponed for discussions with the Gambling Commission to confirm legal requirements were met.
Last week the commission warned homeowners that such competitions could go against the Gambling Act 2005.
A spokesman said prize competitions are free of statutory control under the Act provided they "require sufficient skill, judgment or knowledge".
Schemes that do not meet such a test of skill are classed as lotteries and cannot be operated for private gain.
The question to win the Oldborough Fishing Retreat was "What is the cost of an adult full season coarse fishing licence for 2008/09?"
The prize is their five-bedroom house, four two-bedroom holiday lodges, 9.5 acres of woodland and a two-acre fishing lake.
Mr and Mrs Wilshaw said they were forced to offer the estate as a prize rather than selling it conventionally because of the downturn in the property market.
In a statement on the competition website, they said: "At this late stage of proceedings, the Gambling Commission have asked for more information on the competition question.
"We have been asked to demonstrate why we believe that our question prevented a significant number of people from participating in the competition, which is the main legal test to decide whether or not the competition is authentic rather than a simple lottery or game of chance.
"We are, of course, frustrated by the timing of their queries and the fact that they have previously made open statements to us and to the national press that the competition was lawful."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments