Gurkha veterans lose pensions appeal battle
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Gurkha veterans lost the latest round of their legal battle with the Ministry of Defence over their Army pensions today.
A test case which would have affected about 25,000 veterans who retired before July 1 1997 was dismissed at the High Court earlier this year.
The British Gurkha Welfare Society then took its case on to the Court of Appeal.
Veterans had asked three judges to rule that the Government is acting unlawfully in paying them a third of the income of veterans who retired after the cut-off date and who have parity with UK soldiers.
Their challenge was brought on human rights and discrimination laws.
The judges, sitting in London, today rejected their appeal.
Afterwards the Gurkhas vowed to carry on with their fight.
The Ministry of Defence said the pension cut-off date was "justified and proportionate" and not discriminatory on the grounds of age or nationality.
It said that over the course of a retirement "these Gurkha soldiers will receive at least the same amount of pension as their British counterparts".
Retired Major Tikendra Dal Dewan, chairman of the society, said after the decision: "We are very disappointed with the court's judgment and will be conferring with our legal team over the coming days to discuss taking our case to the European courts.
"Pursuing the legal route is the last thing we wanted, and while the court may have ruled against us today, our commitment to achieving pensions equality is as resolute as ever.
"We maintain that there is a cost benefit to the UK in resolving this issue, let alone the moral obligation of ensuring a respectable quality of life for these elderly Gurkhas and their families, all of whom have given great and devoted service to the UK's armed forces."
Rob Buckland MP, treasurer of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Gurkha Welfare, said: "We are very disappointed that the Court of Appeal has not seen fit to uphold the rights of these brave Gurkha veterans who are only asking for a fair pension settlement, equal to that of the British soldiers they fought alongside.
"We in the All-Party Parliamentary Group will continue to work with the British Gurkha Welfare Society to highlight these inequalities and to fight for equal pensions for Gurkha veterans."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments