Grenfell residents were ‘looked down on’ by council and housing association, inquiry hears
Former resident says he was repeatedly refused independent fire assessment
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.People who lived in the Grenfell Tower were "looked down on" by staff at the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea and the housing association running the building, an inquiry has heard.
Lee Chapman, a former Grenfell leaseholder, said social housing staff adopted an "us vs them" mentality towards residents living in the building.
Giving evidence to the inquiry on Monday, Mr Chapman said he had been repeatedly refused an independent fire assessment of the building by the Kensington and Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation (KCTMO) in spring 2017.
On 14 June 2017, a fire broke out in the kitchen of a fourth four flat and engulfed the tower block in Kensington, west London.
Seventy-two people died in what has been described as one of the UK's worst modern disasters.
A public inquiry into the fire is now looking at issues surrounding social housing management, including risk assessment and handling of tenants' complaints.
On Monday, the inquiry saw chains of emails between Mr Chapman and KCTMO, in which residents were refused an independent fire safety inspection of the building.
In one reply, residents were told KCTMO had been assured recent works were safe by the London Fire Brigade and the National Grid.
It stated: "We do not see it necessary to instruct or fund an independent adjudicator at this time."
Mr Chapman said he feared the fire safety consultant appointed by KCTMO would be tasked with proving residents wrong rather than conducting a proper assessment.
"(KCTMO's responses) made me have the impression that the council would essentially be against the residents because they might think: 'They keep complaining so we need to prove that we are right,"' Mr Chapman told the inquiry on Monday.
"That was the impression that I had at the time, that it was 'us against them', even though in my view we needed to work together to get this result."
Mr Chapman and other members of the leaseholders' association repeatedly requested copies of fire safety reports from the National Grid and the fire brigade which KCTMO claimed it possessed.
These requests were never complied with, the inquiry heard.
"I think with the letters that we sent and the responses that we got, it just didn't seem to fully address (issues) we were raising," Mr Chapman said.
"(There was) nothing addressing the individual parts of it, it was just very generic."
The leaseholders' association also repeatedly raised concerns about residents smoking in the stairwell and the fact that the exposed gas pipes were an easy target for vandalism.
In an email to the KCTMO on 20 March 2017, Mr Chapman said: "Having seen these pipes numerous times, I am seriously concerned about how I will get out of the building alive in the event of a fire with this added risk."
He added: "At the 22nd floor it is a very long way down from the window in the event that after 30 minutes of fire our house is engulfed."
In a second email three days later, Mr Chapman said: "The potential risk to life and our common assets is without doubt very high given that this GAS MAIN is installed through our communal fire escape."
He continued: "I cannot imagine the possible consequences of a fire in this building and as a duty of care the RBKC must ensure we can get out in an emergency, if there is a need to evacuate.
"To be clear, if we cannot get out people will die or at best suffer serious injury."
On the night of the fire, Mr Chapman's wife Dr Naomi Li was one of the last people to escape the building alive.
Mr Chapman said in an earlier statement residents had been "brushed off" by KCTMO and the council.
"I had a sense that the people in the TMO and RBKC looked down on the residents of Grenfell Tower and were brushing us off," he said.
Witness David Collins said the fire safety issues were a product of the culture and leadership at KCTMO.
He said residents had tried to get KCTMO to engage with them on the noise from the upgrade works, poorly fitted windows and the placement of boilers.
"I'd say (fire safety and poor works) are outcomes - whether you have a safe building, it's all about the leadership and the culture," he said.
Mr Collins was one of a number of people who joined a residents' group called Grenfell Community Unite, but staff at KCTMO refused to meet them.
"We tried every way we could possibly find to get a voice and be heard," he said.
Additional reporting by Press Association
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments