Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Gay couple Michael Black and John Morgan sue bed and breakfast owner Susanne Wilkinson over room refusal

 

Tim Moynihan
Monday 17 September 2012 17:45 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A gay couple today sued the owner of bed and breakfast accommodation after she refused to let them stay in a double room because of her religious views.

Michael Black, 64, and partner John Morgan, 59, sought damages from Susanne Wilkinson after she declined to let them have the room at the Swiss Bed and Breakfast in Cookham, Berkshire, in March 2010.

In their particulars of claim to Reading County Court, the couple, from Brampton, near Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, told how Mr Black, an exams consultant and writer, had booked a double room for March 19 2010.

But when he and his computer consultant partner arrived there Mrs Wilkinson made clear to them that she was not prepared to allow them to share a double bed and that she would not accommodate them.

Lawyers from Liberty, the human rights organisation, which has taken up the case, argued that under legal regulations it was unlawful for a person concerned with the provision of services to the public to discriminate against a person on the grounds of that person's sexual orientation.

Lawyers for Mrs Wilkinson argued that a person offering bed and breakfast in their own home was entitled to refuse to permit persons who were not married or in a civil partnership (whether of the opposite sex or the same sex) to share a double bed.

The couple are not in a civil partnership.

In these circumstances, there was no direct or indirect discrimination, they said.

Mrs Wilkinson, a married mother-of-four, considers that providing a double bed to the couple would involve her in promoting what she believed to be a sin, namely sexual relations outside heterosexual marriage.

James Dingemans QC, for Mrs Wilkinson, told the court: "If Mrs Wilkinson had simply said, 'don't come in because you're gay', that could never be justified. It was simply the provision of the double bed which Mrs Wilkinson believed was wrong."

Henrietta Hill, for the couple, said: "It is obvious that there is a difficult balancing act to be carried out in this case. The proper balance to be struck has already been determined by the very clear will of Parliament."

The men seek a declaration that they have been discriminated against, and damages - if they win the case, it has been agreed that £1,800 each would be an appropriate sum, Ms Hill said.

It has been previously reported that they will give any money to charity.

The judge, Recorder Claire Moulder, reserved judgment after the one-day hearing, saying she expected to give her ruling in one to two weeks' time.

PA

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in