Army sergeant died after being shot by soldier with ‘poor eyesight’
Soldier who fired the bullet was not wearing prescription lenses, inquiry finds
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An army sergeant was killed when he was mistakenly shot at by a soldier with ‘poor eyesight’ who thought he was a target, an inquiry has found.
Sgt Gavin Hillier, 35, was fatally wounded during a live firing exercise at Castlemartin base in Pembrokeshire on 4 March 2021.
He was from the 1st Battalion the Welsh Guards and had served in Kosovo, Iraq and Afghanistan, according to an inquiry report that also refers to him as a safety supervisor.
According to the report, the soldier who shot Sgt Hillier, referred to as Guardsman 1, was not wearing prescription lenses at the time and he did not have service-issued spectacles.
In the opinion of an ophthalmologist, this may have resulted in Guardsman 1 having “blurred vision, caused by the low light conditions ... would have caused significant disorientation, further exacerbated by the featureless landscape”.
The inquiry explained that due to the Guardsman’s blurred vision, the intended target, which was 290m (88m) away, would have appeared in the “same detail as someone with normal vision would have seen it at 1,740m [530m]”.
It added that due to entries in Guardsman 1’s medical records, the panel was “content that Gdsm 1 was aware that they needed corrective lenses to meet the entry standards of the Foot Guards”.
“The panel, therefore, deduced it was highly likely that Gdsm 1 understood the requirement to wear corrective lenses.”
The report made several recommendations to prevent such a tragedy from happening again.
It states that officials “should establish an assurance mechanism to ensure that relevant individuals are wearing corrective lenses prior to live firing”.
It also suggests that the Director of Land Warfare “should educate training designers and providers on the available resources, particularly the BCS Handbooks, in order to ensure compliance with the Defence Systems Approach to Training”.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments