Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Gambler denied £500,000 windfall by referee blowing full time whistle in Leeds - Tottenham match ONE SECOND before crucial goal went in

 

Gabriella Swerling
Thursday 31 January 2013 18:59 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

One unlucky gambler has missed out on £500,000 in winnings on an accumulator bet after a referee ended an FA Cup match just one second before the ball was about to dribble over the line and give the man a vital correct score.

The Oldham-based punter, who unsurprisingly wishes remain anonymous, had placed a bet with Ladbrokes on Leeds to beat Tottenham 3-1 on Sunday, together with guesses at scores in several other games. He thought he was going to win when Leeds midfielder Rudolph Austin spotted a golden opportunity to score a long-range goal after Spurs goalkeeper left his net wide open to come upfield for one last attack in the closing seconds.

Yet referee Kevin Friend blew his full time whistle while the ball was still slowly rolling towards the net, meaning the match ended 2-1 despite the ball hitting the back of the net.

Though his wagers on other games meant that he won a respectable £17,055.80, the referee’s controverisla decision stopped him from taking home a cushy £506,562.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in