Woman puts up 4ft barricade covered in grease in bitter row with ramblers over footpath
The dispute, which has been going on for more than 30 years, resulted in a public inquiry last week
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Walkers and a solicitor are embroiled in a legal dispute after she built a 4ft grease-smeared barrier to stop ramblers from damaging an idyllic rural footpath.Ā
Sine Garvie-Mcinally used wooden stakes to block off a 150m stretch of footpath by her home near the Norfolk village of Newton by Castle Acre.
Her makeshift fence has stopped walkers using part of the Nar Valley Way, which runs 20m away from her cottage.
The former Norfolk County Council (NCC) solicitor claims she put up the barrier because the route infringes her right to privacy.
The row, which has been going on for 30 years, resulted in a public inquiry last week.
Speaking at the public hearing, Mrs Garvie-Mcinally said men have urinated outside her garden and she had suffered verbal abuse from walkers.
She said: āIām doing what I can to protect my home - this order would break my statutory right to privacy.
āPeople can see straight into my windows from the path. Men walking on the path have urinated outside my garden.
āI have suffered harassment and had rude comments and gestures made at me.
āIf the decision goes the other way I will have to sell this house as I would not be able to live in quiet enjoyment.ā
The two-day inquiry heard the disputed path forms part of the 33 miles of walking routes through Norfolkās woods and fields.
The Norfolk Ramblers Association say the path was registered as a public right of way, a claim Mrs Garvie-Mcinally states is wrong.
As a result of the row, the footpath has been blocked off with greasy anti-climb paint covering the wooden stakes.
Warning signs have also been put up to tell people that CCTV monitoring is in place.
The dispute dates back to 1993 when Mrs Garvie-Mcinally moved into the village with her family.
The council ruled it the walkway was a registered path but the dispute is over whether it was a public one.
Walkers and riders continued to use the path as its status remained unconfirmed until 2000 when a local landowner put up signs preventing vehicles from using it.
Nine years later, a group of horse riders objected to Norfolk County Council about the posts, complaining about access to the route.
Mrs Garvie-Mcinally then revived her objections to the path and assembled the barricade in August 2020.
The Norfolk Ramblers Association applied to have the path registered as a public right of way which the council agreed to a year later.
Mrs Garvie-Mcinally appealed the decision to the Planning Inspectorate, an agency of the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, which was called in to settle the long-running dispute.
She claims the path lies on āexcepted landā under the Countryside Right of Way Act 2001, because her home is within 20m of the track and therefore breaches her right to privacy.
Locals and walkers, with the help of the National Ramblers Association, produced maps proving the route has been used as far back 1774. They hope this would make the path a public byway through the legal maxim āonce a highway always a highwayā.
Currently, the barrier blocks a section of a path connecting the Nar Valley Way from West Lexham to a road that leads to Castle Acre.
Julie Whales, 67, who lives in nearby Great Dunham, said: āWeāve walked, cycled and horse ridden this route for numerous years and my husband has used it since he was a young lad.
āI cannot believe somebody would like to take away access people have had for hundreds of years, a route which provides access to many villages in the county.ā
Helen Breach, an artist who lives locally, said: āIāve been using this track for 40-odd years and finding this historic route blocked seems an unfriendly action.
āIt spoils peopleās enjoyment of the countryside and seems selfish and not very community-minded.ā
Planning inspector Dr Paul Freer, who chaired the hearing, is expected to announce early next year whether the barricade must go.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments