EU leaflet row: Petition against £9m pro-EU campaign passes 100,000 signatures amid Tory in-fighting
Michael Gove has called the government leaflets 'propaganda' but David Cameron says he will make 'no apology' for them
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.More than 100,000 people have signed a petition against the government’s £9m pro-EU leaflet campaign.
The 16-page leaflet, which is funded by taxpayers and due to be delivered to 27 million households from next week, outlines the Government’s position on the effect of a potential Brexit.
In a speech to students in Exeter yesterday, David Cameron said he would make “no apology” for the fact that the government has a strong view on the issue, calling the decision to publish the leaflets “legal, necessary and right”.
But Eurosceptic campaigner Jayne Adye, who started the online petition last December, told The Independent that the use of Government money gave the campaign to remain in the EU an unfair advantage.
Now that the petition has reached 100,000 signatures, it will be considered for debate in parliament.
The leaflet row has split Conservative ministers on either side of the argument over whether the UK should leave or remain in the EU.
Boris Johnson and Michael Gove have criticised the distribution of the leaflet, which Mr Gove described as a “one-sided piece of propaganda.” Mr Johnson called it “a waste of money” and “hysterical”.
And former Tory minister Liam Fox said he plans to launch his own online petition to make sure the Parliament debate on the issue goes ahead.
However, Defence Secretary Michael Fallon said that the leaflets were in response to a call for more information from the public - a Government survey found that 80% of people wanted more information on the referendum.
In his speech, the Prime Minister referred to similar tactics used by past governments: “That’s what we did in 1975, when we last had a referendum. It’s what the government has done in the Scottish referendum, the Welsh referendum, and other referendums we’ve had,” he said.
The controversial leaflets cost £458,000 to create and £5.9m to print and distribute in two waves, equating to 34p per person.
This is more than the £7m allowed to be spent by the Remain and Leave campaigns, who are also able to send their own freepost leaflets.
The Government leaflets claim that leaving the EU would cause an “economic shock” to the country, with more than three million jobs at risk.
They also warn that a Brexit could result in fewer cheap flights, higher mobile roaming charges and expensive health care for holidaymakers in future.
Ms Adye attacked the “biased information” in the leaflet. “We think it is an abuse of the taxpayer’s money. If it came out of his pocket it would be different, but it’s coming out of our pocket,” she said.
The leaflets will be sent out before “purdah”, the pre-election period which limits government activity in the 28 days before the vote on 23 June, comes into force.
Last September, the government was defeated over proposed changes to the purdah rules.
Ahead of the 1975 referendum, Prime Minister Harold Wilson issued a similar leaflet to every British household, setting out an “independent” government analysis of his renegotiation, alongside the pro- and anti- campaign literature.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments