Low-efficiency homes ‘to cost owners £700 extra in energy bills’
‘The UK’s housing stock is among the least energy-efficient in Europe,’ industry expert says
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Families with inefficient homes will be paying more than £700 a year extra in energy bills from October than those in more efficient properties, according to research. This inequality is expected to hit poor areas the hardest because less efficient homes are clustered there.
Households in England and Wales living in the 19 million homes rated with an energy performance certificate (EPC) of D or below face an average bill increase of £1,730 per year.
This compares to an increase of £982 per year for those in the one-third of housing which meets the government’s target energy efficiency rating of C or above – leaving a gap of £748, according to research by economics consultancy Cebr.
Typically houses with double glazing, good insulation, energy-efficient boilers and LED lighting receive a better EPC, with an A rating the best and G the worst.
These measures all help towards lowering energy bills by improving efficiency.
But the research, carried out on behalf of Kingfisher, which owns B&Q and Screwfix, has revealed a huge regional efficiency divide across Britain.
Homes in Wales, Yorkshire and the West Midlands – regions with some of the highest poverty rates – are set to be hit the hardest by rising bills due to having some of the least energy efficient properties in the UK.
In contrast, on average, Londoners have the most energy efficient homes.
Thierry Garnier, Kingfisher’s chief executive, said: “The UK’s housing stock is among the least energy-efficient in Europe, with UK homes losing heat up to three times faster than European neighbours.
“With a near-£750 gap in bills between the most and least energy efficient homes, and homes responsible for around 20 per cent of the UK’s emissions, tackling this challenge has never been more important.”
The Cebr research comes after a survey of 2,000 adults revealed 84 per cent were already feeling the pressure on their finances from rising energy costs.
On average, they were already paying £131 a month on their gas and electricity bills. October’s energy price cap rise was already weighing on the minds of 67 per cent.
The current and looming pressures on finances have resulted in 61 per cent becoming more interested in improving the energy efficiency of their home.
So much so that 66 per cent would now pay more attention to the efficiency rating of a property were they to move than they would have previously.
Despite a growing interest in energy efficiency measures, only 40 per cent felt they could correctly identify what their EPC rating was.
And just 34 per cent planned to install energy efficiency measures in their property in the next 12 months.
Upfront costs (34 per cent), not knowing enough about the options available (32 per cent) and not being sure if it would be worth the investment (31 per cent) were the main reasons for not doing more.
But 55 per cent of those polled, via OnePoll, were unaware of any government schemes which aimed to improve the energy efficiency of homes, while 66 per cent thought the government should do more.
Among the measures people would like to see introduced were grants to fund or subsidise energy efficiency measures (64 per cent), interestfree or low-interest loans to fund installation (54 per cent) and cutting VAT to zero on all energy efficiency products (51 per cent).
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments