Dying Lockerbie bomber seeks bail
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A "compelling case" exists for releasing the cancer-stricken Lockerbie bomber on bail pending his appeal, a court heard yesterday.
Appeal court judges heard that Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi was terminally ill and should be released on compassionate grounds, because he is nearing death.
Megrahi's defence team at the Court of Criminal Appeal, in Edinburgh, said the former Libyan intelligence agent did not have long to live and should be released in order to reside with his family in Scotland while receiving medical treatment.
But prosecutors argue that the gravity of the offence means that he should remain in jail at HMP Greenock.
Megrahi, 56, is serving a life sentence with a minimum term of 27 years for the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 in 1988, which led to the deaths of 270 people.
Maggie Scott, for the defence, told the hearing yesterday: "The appellant is terminally ill. His suffering will be reduced if he is released from prison conditions. He is very ill and does not have long to live, so bail is therefore sought on compassionate grounds." Ms Scott added: "There is a compelling case for the release of this man on interim liberation."
Ronnie Clancy QC, for the prosecution, said that the gravity of the offence was the Crown's primary argument against granting bail.
"The crime of which the appellant stands convicted is one of incomprehensible gravity," he said.
The judges have now retired to consider whether Megrahi will be granted interim bail ahead of his appeal, which is due to take place next year.
A decision is expected later.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments