Dog owners should ignore the new microchipping law, says senior vet
'Most of the serious adverse reactions (including death) have been in puppies and small breeds'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Dog owners should ignore new microchipping laws because the procedure can kill puppies, according to a veterinary specialist.
Richard Allport, a senior vet and owner of the Natural Medicine Centre in Hertfordshire, said the chip can lead to significant health problems among young dogs and naturally small breeds.
“I think the age by which puppies must be microchipped – eight weeks – is far too young,” wrote Mr Allport in the April issue of niche magazine Dogs Today.
“Most of the serious adverse reactions (including death) have been in puppies and small breeds.
“My advice to people who don’t want their dogs microchipped is to sit tight and do nothing.”
From 6 April all dogs over the age of eight weeks are required to have microchips, which will hold the name and address of the pet’s owner, with fines of up to £500 for flouters. The microchipping procedure involves implanting a sterile chip, approximately the size of a grain of rice, between a dog’s shoulder blades.
Of the country’s 8.5 million dogs, more than a million are not yet registered and up to three million have incorrect details due to owners failing to update their details after moving house.
A Veterinary Medicines Directorate review in 2014 found eight cases in which a dog reacted badly to a microchip.
Mr Allport added: “If the police or council jobsworths come knocking at your door, you have 21 days to get the chipping done if necessary, but if your dog is a senior citizen or is in poor health, ask your vet for an exemption certificate.”
Lost and stray dogs cost the taxpayer and charities £33 million a year, with 110,000 stray dogs picked up off the streets last year alone. The new law, announced by the Government in 2013, means microchips can be used to trace owners from their abused pets and be held criminally liable.
The change in the law is supported by the Dogs Trust and other animal welfare charities as a way of making owners more responsible as well as helping to reunite more stray dogs with their owners.
Clarissa Baldwin, chief executive of Dogs Trust, told The Independent in 2013: “Reducing the UK’s stray dog population is at the very heart of what we do which is why we have committed a considerable amount of money to ensure no dog owners will lack the financial ability to microchip their dog. Currently, microchipping involves a minimal one-off cost, but the benefits last a lifetime.
“The reality is that no matter how responsible an owner you are there is a chance your dog could get lost or stolen - microchipping is the most effective way to assist in a lost dog being returned to their owner. Whether it's an abandoned stray or much loved family pet, there is no such thing as hierarchy in dog pounds.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments