‘They won’t work’: Lancashire council leader says new tier 3 restrictions won’t curb coronavirus in region
‘Government officials refused to take public health evidence on board’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Lancashire council leader who had accused the government of bullying the region into accepting tier 3 coronavirus restrictions has suggested most leaders there do not believe tightened measures will curb infection rates.
Mohammed Iqbal, head of Pendle District Council, slammed the region’s new rules, saying: “I don't think these restrictions will control coronavirus in Pendle or in Lancashire as a whole.
“It was repeatedly pointed out to government officials by Lancashire leaders that targeting just the hospitality sector is not enough.”
The northwest was placed into the highest bracket of the government’s new three-tier Covid alert system on Friday following fraught negotiations between local politicians and government officials.
It means pubs, bars and casinos have been closed down there, while people cannot meet with members of other households in almost any setting.
But in a revelation which will alarm other regional leaders facing similar talks in coming weeks, Councillor Iqbal said: “Boris Johnson’s officials led by Sir Ed Lister were unwilling to listen to any evidence and worryingly for the public could not present to leaders any forward plan on how 10 Downing Street’s proposal will control the virus.
“Schools, retail, the workplace and a minority of non-compliant individuals are where most of the coronavirus transmission occurs. Officials refused to take that public health evidence on board and said that these other areas of significant transmission were off-limits.”
The Labour leader told the Lancashire Telegraph: “Throughout the negotiations, government officials were only interested in the politics and threatened any district leader who did not fall into line with 10 Downing Street that their borough ‘would become an island’ that would receive much less in funding and resource.”
The criticism follows other leaders expressing disquiet at how discussions had unfolded.
Paul Foster, the Labour leader of South Ribble Council, had said: “We’ve [been] bullied, harassed, threatened and blackmailed into moving into tier 3
“The government basically said they would place residents into more draconian measures in those districts that didn’t agree to a deal.”
The new rules – which it is understood will see the region receive £42m in financial support – came into force at midnight on Saturday.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments