Pork, Pimms and Boris for PM: A day with the 0.3 per cent of the population deciding the UK’s next leader

They are among the 0.3 per cent of the UK population – about 150,000 people – who will get to decide the country’s next prime minister

Annie Dawkes and Lynn Grifiths raise a toast in rural Wem (The Independent)

On the manicured lawns of Peter and Marjorie Marsh’s home – Aston Hall, a 15th century pile – 150 guests sit around trestle tables enjoying a hog roast and glasses of Pimms.

They are mainly retired and, if the spacious driveway and courtyard out front is any indication, have arrived here in a variety of Aston Martins, BMWs and Range Rovers.

They are also among the 0.3 per cent of the UK population – about 150,000 people – who will get to decide the country’s next prime minister.

This is the summer social of the North Shropshire Conservatives.

And, if the conversation today is any indication, there is only one person many of these grassroots members want to see as PM. Er, Boris Johnson.

“Who do I like?” asks Marjorie, the 78-year-old host – and great-grandmother-of-five – at one point. “I can answer you that in one second, dear: I’m perfectly happy with the fellow we have. Boris. Yes, he’s been a naughty boy. He told lies. But he knows how to roll his sleeves up and get stuck in. I think he’s one of the few politicians who knows there’s a part of the country that exists that isn’t called London.”

Time and again, over the al fresco baps and booze here in the village of Wem, the same sentiment is expressed: Johnson may not always have quite been on nodding terms with the truth but, when it counted, he had got things done.

“Brexit, Ukraine, the vaccine roll out,” says Marjorie. “He’s been given a terrible time of it, and he’s dealt with everything that’s been thrown at him. That’s what matters.”

This may be something of an irony – because it is arguably North Shropshire that did as much as anyone to get rid of Johnson. The Tories astonishing by-election defeat to the Lib Dems in this true blue heartland in December was perhaps the beginning of the end for his premiership. Some people here even voted yellow.

“But I wanted to give the government a shock,” says one. “Not bloody well decapitate it.”

Peter and Marjorie Marsh out side their home (The Independent)

In any case, what of the two now competing to replace him? Rishi Sunak and Liz Truss? A general air of ambiguity; of minds not made up; of neither candidate exactly having the stardust – or indeed the policies – to excite in the same way that, yes, Johnson (and Get Brexit Done) did back in 2019.

“You think about a dinner party and you’d have Boris round the table in a flash,” says Lynn Grifiths, a retired bank worker. “But [Sunak and Truss] I’m not so sure.”

A moment of reflection. She is one of the few people here who think the PM had to go following the Partygate and Chris Pincher scandals. “Of course,” she says, “having someone at your table isn’t the same as trusting them to cook the dinner, if you will.”

Two other main observations here in the sun, then.

The first. Truss’s tax-cutting promises do not appear to be the vote winner with grassroots members that many might assume. Among these North Shropshire Tories at least there is a consensus that Sunak is more trusted on the economy; that he is right to say the country should not be borrowing money to fund such a scheme and that it risks inflation. Surprisingly, perhaps, there is also an apparent feeling that, in the midst of an almost unparalleled cost of living crisis, reducing taxes won’t help those most in need.

“People like me aren’t the ones who need help,” says Michael Macdonald, 79, a retired farmer. “I keep saying the people who are suffering the most don’t pay tax or they pay very little [because they earn less]. Cutting it is no good for them, and it’s those who need that assistance.”

Because morally it’s the right thing to do? “Yes, it is,” he says, before pointing out that economies aren’t grown by allowing significant numbers of people to fall into poverty.

Retired farmer Michael Macdonald says people like him ‘aren’t the ones who need help’ (The Independent)

The second observation?

Despite the above, Truss appears – just about – to be the more liked of the two candidates. Sunak’s extraordinary wealth, private school education and slick presentation have, to some extent, isolated him from these party members. His wife’s tax affairs – she escaped millions in potential UK tax by being non-domiciled – remains something of a sore point too.

“How can someone like that have any conception of what ordinary people are going through?” asks Annie Dawkes, a retired drawing officer assistant. “He’s too far removed from normal life.”

There may be some pot-kettle-black here. This is a summer social, after all, where the host has a robotic mower continually cutting his vast lawn. Few here, one might suggest, will also have any conception of the struggles many will face this winter. But then, as one person notes of the apparent contradiction: “No one ever said politics makes sense.”

Peter Broomhall is not impressed with Sunak’s apparent lack of manners (The Independent)

Something else which may well lose Sunak votes, Peter Broomhall, a 72-year-old councillor says, is his conduct during the BBC TV debate. On 14 separate occasions, the former chancellor interrupted the foreign secretary.

“It was discourteous,” says Broomhall. “That isn’t how you conduct a debate for high office and for a lot of these people” – an arm around the garden party – “manners matter”.

There is, of course, still a long way to go until the winner is announced on 5 September. Between then and now, there will be several hustings across the country, many more media appearances and almost certainly one or two surprises. Opinions do not seem so set that they are unmovable. Yet here in Shropshire, for now, it feels like Truss may be edging her way towards No 10.

A third, final, observation, then.

In contrast to a majority across the wider country, not one person here appears to feel a general election should be held once a new leader is decided.

Is it fair that 0.3 per cent of the country gets to choose the country’s new prime minister? A glint in Broomhall’s eye. “Of course,” he says. “We can be trusted. We’ll get it right.”