Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Cheltenham cocks a snook at candyfloss

Cyril Dixon
Saturday 09 July 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

FIRST IT was chilli relish and potatoes, now candyfloss and hot dogs. In the genteel enclave of Cheltenham, they are all seen as indicators of unwanted social and cultural change. Accordingly, they have been banned as too down market.

The latest barrier to encroaching vulgarity was erected by Cheltenham council's licensing committee nine days ago. They decided against allowing the sale of candyfloss and hot dogs in parts of the High Street during the run-up to Christmas. Neither contributed to the Victorian flavour they want for the festive season.

Last year, the same committee vetoed the sale of chilli and other 'exotic' relishes as fillings for baked potatoes sold by High Street stalls. It was the smell, they said. In the past, the same explanation has justified banning sausages, while a prospective vegetable-stall trader was turned down because unwashed potatoes were deemed unsightly.

Cheltonians are sensitive people; the ruling Liberal Democrats also refused hypnotists permission to perform in nightclubs, and a block has been put on charity collections.

Bill Bullingham, a former Tory mayor, is critical. 'We have a town steeped in history, but some councillors need reminding that we are in the 20th century.'

But over-enthusiasm for tradition goes further than the Liberals and comes much uglier. It was Mr Bullingham's local party colleagues who caused outrage three years ago by objecting to the selection of John Taylor, a black barrister, to contest the Parliamentary seat of Cheltenham vacated by retiring MP Sir Charles Irving. Worse, the electors who gave Sir Charles a 4,896-vote majority rejected Taylor, returning Liberal Democrat Nigel Jones by 1,668 votes. Taylor later said race was a factor in the result.

The objectors claimed to speak for Old Cheltenham, a bastion of tradition preserved in the town's elegant Montpellier area. Here, among Regency architecture, fountains and gardens, is the Conservative headquarters.

Cheltenham earned its stuffy reputation in the days when wealthy Victorians came to take the spa waters. Later, it became a favourite retirement town for naval officers.

Today though Cheltenham is town of big corporations, including Eagle Star, Dowty, and Smiths Industries. There are chain stores in the High Street, council estates, unemployment, burglaries and drug-taking.

This weekend, Miss Doreen Wright, 90, a thoroughbred Cheltonian, reflected on the changes. 'It is a slum, and yet it was a millionaire's paradise,' she said. 'We have litter and cigarette ends everywhere, and we have tramps sleeping under the bandstand. It is because we don't have the real Cheltonians anymore.'

However, Taylor rushed to defend the people he once sought to represent. 'The people of Cheltenham are not stuffy. It is an attractive town, full of attractive people.' Deborah Griggs, the Mayor of Cheltenham, said: 'It is a town of the 1990s with super people.'

Councillor Alan Stone, who, as chair of licensing, is responsible for the latest ban, takes criticism personally. 'I am a Cheltonian, and I wouldn't say we are snobbish.'

Although he himself likes both hot dogs and candyfloss, he feels they do not belong in the High Street at Christmas. 'They are more in place at a fairground.'

Officials have advised Edward Danter, the main victim of the candyfloss and hot dog ban, that if he 'Victorianises' his stall, he may be able to pitch it in the High Street after all.

As he sold his wares to children in Montpellier Gardens this weekend, Danter, 39, said: 'If they stop it altogether, it is a sad day. Children from all over the place enjoy my candyfloss.'

His gentle reaction was not shared by customers. Amanda Urch, 23, said: 'If we want it why shouldn't we be allowed to have it whatever the time of year. Its just plain snobbishness.'

(Photographs omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in