Home Office to reopen ‘dangerous’ immigration removal centre as part of Rwanda plan
Campsfield to open again as 400-bed detention site to ‘support’ plan to ship asylum seekers to east Africa
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An immigration removal centre that was closed by the government four years ago amid mounting concern about conditions is set to re-open, in what critics have described as a “backward step”.
The Home Office has announced that Campsfield House, in Kidlington, Oxfordshire, will be redeveloped in order to create a 400-bed removal centre for men.
In a letter to Liberal Democrat MP Layla Moran on Tuesday, immigration minister Tom Pursglove said the reopening of the centre would “support” the government’s controversial plan to ship asylum seekers to Rwanda.
He added that the re-opening of the site would also “form part of our ongoing review of both detention capacity and geographical footprint”.
The centre closed in 2018 after years of being subject to fierce criticism over concerns about the length of time people were being locked up and the high proportion of detainees taken into detention and then subsequently released.
Ms Moran, MP for Oxford West and Abingdon, who campaigned for Campsfield’s closure, described the decision to reopen the centre as a “backward step” that is “potentially dangerous” given the effect that being locked up there can have on detainees.
“It’s absolutely disgraceful. We know about the detrimental effect it has on people, many of whom have gone through torture, come from war zones, and then they’re put in this centre,” she told The Independent.
“We as a community campaigned for more than 20 years to get it closed down. It was a promise that even Theresa May made in 2014.
“It’s a clear failure of [the government’s] immigration policies. We will be doing everything we can to stop the reopening. I can’t believe we’re in this position again […] I’m sure it’s because they want to look tough on immigration when in fact it’s an admission that they’ve failed completely.”
In November 2018, the then immigration minister Caroline Nokes announced that the site, which originally opened in 1993, was to be closed as part of the then home secretary Sajid Javid’s commitment to cut the number of people detained at any given time and improve the welfare of detainees.
She said at the time that by the summer of 2019, the department would aim to reduce the immigration detention estate by almost 40 per cent since 2015.
Government data shows that the detained population reduced by 25 per cent during that timeframe, from 32,447 to 24,480. It also shows that it has since risen again, to 25,282 in the year ending March 2022.
Maria Brul, campaigns and advocacy coordinator at Detention Action, said: "Over 20 years, Campsfield immigration detention centre was the site of a teenage suicide, hunger strikes and the unjust detention of thousands of people seeking asylum.
“It was closed by Mr Javid in an attempt to avoid the extreme harm that indefinite detention causes. Its reopening is a sign that Priti Patel is long out of ideas, and so is once again opting to inflict trauma and misery on more Black and Brown people."
A “prior information notice” for the contract to manage the refurbished site is being issued on Tuesday, marking the first phase of the procurement, indicating the Home Office’s intention to go to the market within the next twelve months.
Mr Pursglove said in his letter to Mr Moran: “We intend to appoint a single supplier to deliver all services – with the exception of healthcare services which we expect to be commissioned by NHS England - including custodial, within the detained accommodation.”
He said it would comprise a “new-build living unit alongside refurbishment and remodelling of existing accommodation, meeting statutory standards”, and that it would take into account the recommendations in the Shaw review, published in 2018, which described conditions in removal centres as “unacceptable”.
Announcing the plan on Tuesday, Mr Pursglove said: “Those who have abused the immigration system, including foreign national criminals who have devastated the lives of their victims, should be in no doubt of our determination to remove them. This is what the British public rightly expects.
“Opening a new immigration removal centre, as part of the New Plan for Immigration, will help ensure there is sufficient detention capacity to safely accommodate individuals ahead of removal.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments