British Isis suicide bomber ‘did not receive £1m from UK government’, family says
Briton is said to have blown himself up in an explosives-laden vehicle in a village south of Mosul
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The family of a former Guantanamo Bay detainee reportedly killed in an Islamic State suicide bomb attack in Iraq has denied he received £1 million compensation from the British government.
Jamal al-Harith, from Manchester, was identified by family members from a photograph issued by Isis showing him at the wheel of a truck packed with explosives which he was said to have driven into a military base near Mosul.
The disclosure that the 50-year-old - previously known as Ronald Fiddler before converting to Islam - had received a substantial compensation payment from the UK government after ministers lobbied to secure his release from Guantanamo Bay in 2004 sparked a furious political blame game.
However, a statement to the BBC on behalf of the family said they believed the claimed figure of £1 million was wide of the mark and referred to a group settlement made to four ex-detainees - including al-Harith - and included their costs.
They blamed his treatment at Guantanamo Bay, where he was held by the Americans, for his subsequent involvement with the terror group.
The statement said: "The Jamal they knew up until 2001 when he was taken to Guantanamo Bay would not have become involved with a despicable organisation such as so-called Isis.
"He was a peaceful and gentle person.
"Whatever he may or may not have done since then they believe from their own experience he was utterly changed by the physical and mental cruelty and the inhuman treatment he endured for two years at Guantanamo."
PA
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments