Branson accuses Camelot of undermining lottery regulator
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The lottery operator Camelot has been accused by Sir Richard Branson of using dirty tricks and bullying to undermine the credibility of the lottery regulator.
The lottery operator Camelot has been accused by Sir Richard Branson of using dirty tricks and bullying to undermine the credibility of the lottery regulator.
Sir Richard accused Camelot, his rival for the next lottery licence, of "trying to use threatening and desperate tactics" with the National Lottery Commission because it knew that his bid for the next lottery licence offered more money for good causes.
In a statement released last night, Sir Richard signalled an end to the unofficial truce between the two bidders by claiming Camelot was becoming increasing desperate about its chances despite winning a High Court action against the commission 12 days ago. He said Camelot's recent attacks on the credibility of the National Lottery Commission seemed to undermine the company's promises to the High Court to act in good faith to ensure the next licence began smoothly.
Last month, Mr Justice Richards quashed the commission's decision to hold exclusive talks on the next licence with Sir Richard's People's Lottery organisation as it was "conspicuously unfair" to Camelot. He ordered the commission to give Camelot an extra month to improve its bid.
Sir Richard's criticisms were echoed last night by Simon Burridge, chief executive of the People's Lottery, whoclaimed Camelot was putting its own commercial interests ahead of the interests of good causes in its dispute with the commission.
He said Camelot's renewed complaints about the commission's conduct suggested it would mount further legal actions if the regulator again chose the People's Lottery. If these threats delayed a final decision on the next licence until after November, it was highly unlikely the People's Lottery would be able to install and test all its terminals and games in time for the new licence date, 1 October 2001, damaging public public confidence and leaving the operator open to fines from the commission.
A Camelot spokesman retorted: "I would like to remind Mr Burridge it was only a few days ago that the High Court found Camelot had been misled and treated with conspicuous unfairness by the commission. Any delay lies in the failure of the commissioners to do their duty, namely to preside over a fair and unbiased bidding process. We have always maintained that fair competition is the best way of securing the best deal for the good causes."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments