Bloody Sunday statement 'fabricated'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A soldier giving evidence to the Bloody Sunday tribunal said yesterday that he lied to the original 1973 inquiry to protect his colleagues and the Army's reputation.
A soldier giving evidence to the Bloody Sunday tribunal said yesterday that he lied to the original 1973 inquiry to protect his colleagues and the Army's reputation.
The former paratrooper, identified as Soldier 027, says he "fabricated" his statement after an army lawyer expressed concern about his version of events. He told the inquiry, chaired by Lord Saville of Newdigate, sitting at the Methodist Central Hall in Westminster: "I believe in the first statement which I made I used fabrication." Later he described it as "complete fabrication".
Under questioning by Christopher Clarke QC, counsel for the inquiry, Soldier 027 also rejected his original claim that he heard several shots from different calibre weapons coming from Chamberlain Street and Pilot Row in Londonderry. "I believe that report of weapons firing to be untrue," he said.
On Wednesday he gave evidence to the inquiry saying there was "no justification" for the killing of 13 unarmed civilians during the civil rights march on January 30 1972. He also said two of his former colleagues were responsible for up to 10 of the 13 deaths.
His statement to the Widgery tribunal, which originally investigated Bloody Sunday, was crafted in order to prevent "dropping people directly in it", he said.
It excluded names and anything about the manner in which people were shot because he "wished to avoid doing anything that would reflect badly on the Army".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments