Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

What was Bloody Sunday? Former British soldiers could charges over Derry shootings

Fourteen people were killed and 15 wounded when paratroopers opened fire on civil rights march

Colin Drury
Thursday 14 March 2019 10:50 GMT
Comments
Fiftieth anniversary of Bloody Sunday

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Seventeen former British soldiers will find out today if they are to be charged in relation to the 1972 Bloody Sunday massacre in Derry.

The men have been told they may face trials for murder, attempted murder and causing grievous bodily injury with intent to endanger life if prosecutors in Northern Ireland believe there is enough evidence against them.

Charges may also be brought against two former Official IRA members involved in the day’s bloodshed.

Fourteen people were killed and at least 15 more wounded when British paratroopers opened fire against what was classed as an illegal civil rights march through the border city on 30 January 1972.

Representatives of the soldiers – who have never been publicly identified – insisted they only started shooting after fearing they themselves were about to come under attack from the 30,000 strong crowd.

But initial official attempts to suggest the dead had been armed with guns or nail bombs were dismissed in what became the longest-running and most expensive public inquiry in British history.

The Saville Inquiry, which lasted 12 years and ran to millions of words, concluded in 2010 that the killings had been "unjustified and unjustifiable" – a finding which first opened up the possibility of criminal charges being made against the veterans involved.

In a statement to the Parliament at the time, then prime minister David Cameron unreservedly apologised to the families of the victims.

A police inquiry was subsequently launched against 20 suspects – 18 former members of the 1st Battalion of the Parachute Regiment, as well as two former "Official IRA" members – although one soldier has since died.

The complex investigation took in 668 witness statements as well as numerous physical exhibits including photographs and audio recordings before files were passed to the Public Prosecution Service of Northern Ireland.

Reacting to the news that a decision on charges was imminent, families of those killed said they had spent almost half a century searching for justice.

John Kelly, who saw his 17-year-old brother Michael killed that day, told The Guardian: “He would have been 64 had he lived. Those soldiers have to face the consequence of what they did. I believe they should get a life sentence. None of them have ever shown any remorse, not at the Saville Inquiry or since.”

The 70-year-old added: “I was with Michael when he was shot. I went in the ambulance with him. I can still see him lying there. He was a young boy. His face turned grey and a sort of green colour. I was in the mortuary afterwards. There were nine or 10 bodies. It was pure carnage. My mother never got over the loss of her son.”

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

In a letter to MPs pre-empting the announcement of the potential charges, the Ministry of Defence said, if any were brought, it would fund the defence bills of the veterans – most of who are thought to be in their 70s and 80s.

It said: “We are committed to providing high-quality welfare and pastoral support to all those veterans affected by historic investigations… Barristers, including senior counsel, will be instructed to represent individual veterans in any court proceedings that follow or to advise on specialist areas of laws as necessary.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in