'Bad planning' to blame for MoD computer delay
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A £7bn computer system ordered by the Ministry of Defence (MoD) could not handle secret material, a report has revealed.
The system "was badly planned in important respects", the Commons' Public Accounts Committee (PAC) concluded. It added that "entirely inadequate research" was done and a "major miscalculation" led to delays.
The project was led by EDS, a firm whose track record had "not been exemplary" and had "underestimated the complexity" of the project. It meant the system could not handle secret material and the MoD was left to depend on its old network.
The MPs warned: "Given the scale of delay, the MoD must head off the risk that existing IT systems... will fail." The money needed to do this, they said, should come from fees being paid to Atlas, part of the EDS consortium, and not the taxpayer.
The report stated that the programme, Defence Information Infrastructure (DII), should have installed 62,800 terminals by July 2007, but only 45,600 were in place by September 2008, and that its costs had risen by £182m.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments