Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Army chief: 'Warnings over Iraqi civilian deaths were ignored'

Attempts to apply Geneva Convention to prisoners were met 'by resistance at every level... both political and legal'

Andrew Johnson
Sunday 24 February 2008 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

An army legal chief raised concerns about deaths of civilian prisoners in Iraq at the hands of British troops as long ago as May 2003, but was repeatedly ignored "at all levels" of the Government and military, The Independent on Sunday can reveal.

The latest damning revelations were made in a written communication between one of the Army's most senior legal officials and his colleagues. In May 2003, just weeks after the war ended, Lieutenant Colonel Nicholas Mercer, then chief legal adviser to the First Armoured Division, wrote expressing his concern that "there have recently been a number of deaths in custody where Iraqi civilians have died whilst being held by various units in theatre".

This was four months before the now well-documented killing of hotel worker Baha Mousa, 26, who was beaten to death in September 2003, and a year before the alleged execution of 20 prisoners by British troops, outlined at a press conference on Friday.

The MoD said that Lt Col Mercer was referring to two cases, both of which were deaths by natural causes.

While giving evidence to the court martial into the Baha Mousa case – in which six soldiers were acquitted and one was jailed for a year – Lt Col Mercer added that the period of most concern was between the point of arrest and drop-off at a detention facility, ie while prisoners were in transit.

He also said that attempts to put into place a detention policy based on one praised by the UN in East Timor, overseen by a UK judge, were "consistently blocked". And he added that he met "resistance" to his argument that the Geneva Convention should apply to prisoners, "at every level... both political and legal".

This week, lawyers acting for the family of Kareem Jabber Ali, a 16-year-old boy who drowned in May 2003 after allegedly being forced to swim a canal by British troops, will be seeking damages in the High Court. Three soldiers were cleared of manslaughter in the case.

An MoD spokeswoman said that allegations of the massacre outlined on Friday had been investigated and no evidence of such killings had been found. She added that an investigation by Brigadier Robert Aitken, who reported last month, found that there was no systemic abuse by British troops in Iraq. In respect of the Baha Mousa case, she said: "The Defence Secretary has agreed to receive representations from the legal representatives for Mr Mousa's family, and will make a further statement."

She also pointed out that 120,000 troops had served in Iraq and there had been only a handful of allegations of abuse.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in