Archie Battersbee’s parents fail in Supreme Court life-support bid
Hollie Dance and Paul Battersbee appealed to justices to bar hospital bosses from stopping life-support treatment until they had time to make an application to the UN
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The parents of brain-damaged Archie Battersbee have failed to persuade the Supreme Court to intervene in a life-support treatment battle.
The 12-year-old boy has been in a comatose state since being found unconscious with a ligature over his head on 7 April.
Archie’s mother and father, Hollie Dance and Paul Battersbee, had asked the Supreme Court justices for more time to carry on their fight, after earlier this week a court ruled his ventilator could legally be switched off.
They wanted Supreme Court justices to bar hospital bosses from stopping life-support treatment until they have had time to make an application to the UN.
But this afternoon, three justices refused their application.
“The parents of Archie Battersbee filed their application to appeal to the Supreme Court earlier today,” said a Supreme Court spokeswoman in a statement.
“They were seeking a stay of the Court of Appeal’s decision to allow withdrawal of life-support treatment from their child.
“Aware of the urgency of this matter, the court convened a panel of three Justices who considered submissions from the parties ‘on paper’, in the usual way.
“Having considered the careful judgment of the Court of Appeal... the panel has refused permission to appeal to the Supreme Court.”
Archie’s parents say the UN has a protocol which allows “individuals and families” to make complaints about violations of disabled people’s rights.
They say the UN could ask the UK government to delay the withdrawal of life support to Archie while a complaint is investigated.
A spokesman for the Christian Legal Centre, who are supporting Archie’s parents, has indicated that Archie‘s parents wanted to approach the UN rather than the European court.
“The UK has joined the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which gives individuals a right to complain about any violations of the Convention to the UN Committee,” he said.
“The committee has previously criticised the UK system of authorising withdrawal of life support from disabled people based on the court determination of their best interests rather than on their own wishes.”
Doctors treating Archie at the Royal London Hospital in Whitechapel, east London, believe he is brain-stem dead and say continued life-support treatment is not in his best interests.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments