Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Anti-cuts protesters convicted of trespass over occupation of Fortnum & Mason

Judge voices sympathy with demonstration and refuses to award store compensation for losses

Kevin Rawlinson
Friday 18 November 2011 01:00 GMT
Comments
More than 130 people were charged with occupying the shop but proceedings against 109 were discontinued
More than 130 people were charged with occupying the shop but proceedings against 109 were discontinued (AFP)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Protesters whose occupation of Fortnum & Mason shut down the central London department store during an anti-cuts rally in March were convicted yesterday of aggravated trespass.

The 10 defendants were each given a conditional discharge and told to pay £1,000 towards prosecution costs. Speaking outside City of Westminster Magistrates' Court, they vowed to appeal and said they would "definitely" take part in future occupations.

District Judge Michael Snow, delivering his guilty verdicts, said civil disobedience had "a long and entirely peaceful history in this country and history often vindicates those involved in such acts". He added that the right to protest should not be confined to "anondyne or uncontroversial" acts.

But he said the sit-in at Fortnum's in Piccadilly, which was targeted by members of the UK Uncut campaign group on the day of a large TUC rally in the capital, had "overstepped" the mark.

The court heard that the protesters organised the occupation of the store on Twitter because they believed the company was "guilty of tax avoidance".

The demonstrators claimed they were "found guilty of taking part in a protest" and pointed to evidence given by police that the occupation was "sensible" and "non-violent". Euan Storrar, 24, from Surrey; Daniel Lichman, 25, and Grainne Gannon, 29, from London; Sebastian Jones and Oliver Pope, both 20, of Southampton; Adam Ramsay, 26, from Perthshire; Edward Bauer, 23, of Hampshire; Oliver Rodker, 42, of Manchester, and Peter Speller, 26, of Oxford, were all conditionally discharged for six months and ordered to pay £1,000 costs.

Jake Colman, 22, from London, who was already subject to a conditional discharge for a separate offence, was given a six-month conditional discharge, told to pay £1,000 costs and fined £215.

Judge Snow said: "The scene inside the store was chaotic. Protesters were shouting and screaming at a very high volume." There were chants of, "If you don't pay your taxes, shut you down", "Whose shop, our shop", and "Occupy, occupy, pay your taxes", the court heard.

The judge refused to award Fortnum's compensation, despite the shutdown costing it £54,000 in lost sales. A further £17,000 in damage was caused by people unconnected to the occupation.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in