Aldi censured over misleading advert suggesting shoppers could save 45% by switching from Tesco
Use of pricey Moet et Chandon champagne ‘skewed’ comparison with rival supermarket
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Tesco has succeeded in having Aldi censured over an advert that misled customers about the potential savings to be had by switching to the cut-price competitor.
The press advert was seen in the run-up to Christmas 2018 and showed baskets of festive treats including chocolate and champagne from both supermarkets with the heading: “Swap to Aldi and save”.
Readers were told Tesco’s basket, featuring a bottle of Moet et Chandon champagne, would cost £61.56 as opposed to Aldi’s £32.54 offering of “exclusive” brands and fresh products. Aldi’s basket included its own-brand Veuve Monsigny champagne.
A further line stated: “Save 45 per cent”, while small text at the bottom of the page said: “Tesco may sell ‘own-brand’ products at different prices.”
Tesco complained that the champagne products included in the selection unfairly skewed the price comparison in Aldi’s favour, and that the advert did not make sufficiently clear that Tesco also sold alternative champagne products that were cheaper than Moet.
In its defence Aldi said that comparing own-brand and branded products was “inherently permissible”, adding that its own champagne was the second-most popular on the market – after the Moet to which it was compared.
But the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) upheld Tesco’s complaint, ruling that Aldi had given consumers the overall impression they could make significant savings generally by switching their loyalties.
It noted that the Aldi champagne was priced at £11.49, while the Moet cost £28, accounting for more than half the price difference between the two baskets.
The ASA said: “Given that there were other lower and mid-range priced champagnes available at Tesco, both branded and unbranded, which would be considered by price-conscious consumers to be more comparable with the Aldi product, we considered that the inclusion of the Moet product in the basket of goods skewed the comparison and was likely to mislead consumers.”
It added: “We told Aldi to ensure that when making multi-product comparisons in future they did not imply that consumers could make more general savings if the claim was based only on a specific selection of goods, rather than a typical weekly shop.
“We also told them to ensure that their selection of comparator products did not mislead.”
An Aldi spokesman said: “This was a one-off seasonal advert published more than seven months ago. The ruling does not impact our ongoing Swap and Save adverts, which clearly show how much shoppers can save by switching to Aldi.”
Additional reporting by PA
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments