HIV among heterosexuals 'may be underestimated'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.HIV INFECTION in the heterosexual population may be underestimated, according to French researchers. They say that by testing women towards the end of their pregnancy for the infection that leads to Aids they miss fewer cases, writes Celia Hall.
They found a 0.4 per cent prevalence of HIV in a population of 11,593 women from Paris and four suburbs, an area that accounts for 46 per cent of French HIV.
This is higher than a comparable British statistic for inner London, where the highest levels of HIV have been recorded. For inner London prevalence, testing of new-born babies produced an incidence of 0.2 per cent.
The British test shows HIV anti-bodies which the mother has automatically passed to her baby, but it is only conducted following live births. The French test was conducted regardless of whether the women completed their pregnancy and had a live baby.
The research in tomorrow's Lancet says that under half of the HIV women had a live baby - reducing the prevalence rate one and a half times. HIV was also higher in women who had abortions or ectopic pregnancies. They say that for these reasons, neo-natal prevalence studies could also 'strongly underestimate' the prevalence of HIV in pregnant women in France and elsewhere.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments