What are judicial review proceedings Harry wants to bring against Home Office?
The Duke of Sussex aims to challenge the decision not to allow him to personally pay for UK police protection.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Duke of Sussex has filed a claim for a judicial review against a Home Office decision not to allow him to personally pay for police protection for himself and his family while in the UK.
Harry wants to bring his children to visit from the US, but he and his family are “unable to return to his home” because it is too dangerous, according to a legal representative for the duke.
“He sought a judicial review in September 2021 to challenge the decision-making behind the security procedures, in the hopes that this could be re-evaluated for the obvious and necessary protection required,” the legal representative said in a statement to the PA news agency.
– What is a judicial review?
It is a type of court case in which a claimant challenges the lawfulness of a decision made by a public body or government department, such as the Home Office, according to the Judiciary UK website.
A judge reviews the way in which a decision has been made.
The court is not really concerned with the conclusions of that process and whether they were right or wrong, as long as the right procedures have been followed.
The court will not re-make the decision.
If the claimant wins, the decision can be declared unlawful, or quashed.
That will usually mean the decision has to be taken again. While the public body could reach the same decision again, it may follow a proper procedure that leads to a different decision result.
– At what stage is Harry’s claim?
Legal representatives for Harry applied for permission to bring judicial review proceedings against Home Secretary Priti Patel on September 20, according to a spokesperson.
Judicial review claims have a threshold test before they can proceed.
The court will consider whether there is an arguable case for a judicial review, a decision that typically will be made without a hearing.
If permission is granted, the claim would proceed to a substantive hearing.