Hanley slips up again over funding of adviser
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE accident-prone Jeremy Hanley, the Tory party chairman, was forced into another public retreat yesterday after accepting that a new adviser would be paid by Conservative Central Office rather than the taxpayer, writes Donald Macintyre.
The embarrassment arose after the party let it be understood that Mr Hanley's new personal political adviser, currently a lobbyist with Lowe Bell Communications, would be paid as a civil servant employed by the Cabinet Office. Although advisers in government departments are generally paid for out of public funds as members of the Civil Service, previous special advisers to party chairman have been automatically paid by the party.
The new adviser is to be Tim Rycroft, a former official of the Social Democratic Party who defected to the Tories before the last general election. His appointment has yet to be formally approved by John Major.
After hasty Saturday night consultations between editions of the Sunday Telegraph, which reported the original story, it was confirmed that as Mr Rycroft's principal duties would be party ones, he would after all be paid out of party funds.
The original notion of using public funds to pay all or part of his salary appears to have arisen because, as Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, Mr Hanley is also a member of the Cabinet.
But both the previous two chairmen to have special advisers - Kenneth Baker and Chris Patten - were also chancellors of the Duchy of Lancaster. Whitehall sources expressed some surprise last night that the party ever could have thought that Mr Rycroft could have his salary met by public funds.
The flurry over Mr Rycroft comes less than a week after Mr Hanley, to the intense irritation of the Treasury, and in contrast to most City forecasts, implied that Monday's 1 2 per cent rise in interest rates would be the last.
(Photograph omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments