Gummer targets bad architecture
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.First Edition
JOHN GUMMER yesterday declared war on bad architecture and poor urban planning. The Secretary of State for the Environment launched a glossy document intended to put an end to a free-for-all approach towards development.
He wants every new building, from small starter homes to giant shopping and office developments, to stand the test of time - fitting into its locality, doing its job well and pleasing the eye far into the next century.
The consultation document, Quality in Town and Country, will be followed by a symposium later this year. It is intended to warn all developers that from now on the watchword will be quality, and to give heart to local councils minded to refuse planning permission because they consider a proposed development to be an eyesore.
Mr Gummer is keen on the concept of urban villages, communities of several thousand where people can live, shop and work all within walking distance. This was the principle behind the Poundbury housing scheme near Dorchester, promoted by the Prince of Wales and the Duchy of Cornwall.
'Some communities feel that they have been burdened with poorly designed buildings, shoddily built, uncompromising in their visual assault on the neighbourhood and oblivious to the needs of their users,' Mr Gummer told developers, architects and planners in London yesterday. 'At the extreme, they degrade their setting fatally.'
Not only large developments like high-rise flats were to blame, he said. People perceived 'a gradual erosion of the local fabric by small-scale, everyday developments'.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments