Guildford appeal 'not told facts'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE Court of Appeal, which freed the Guildford Four, had not been given 'even a small fraction of the true facts' of the case, an Old Bailey jury was told yesterday.
'Within minutes of the Four's release they were being cheered and praised as martyrs, they were having huge sums of public money showered upon them in supposed recompense for the grave injustice said to have been visited upon them,' Edmund Lawson QC, said.
By contrast, as the Four walked out of the Old Bailey in 1989 to 'tumultuous applause', three Surrey detectives were 'convicted in their absence as being the policemen responsible for what was allegedly one of the biggest miscarriages of justice in modern times and sentenced to vilification and contempt in the media by a court which had not been given even a small fraction of the true facts'.
Mr Lawson, for former Detective Constable Vernon Attwell, 52, made the claims in his final speech in the trial of Mr Attwell, former Detective Chief Inspector Thomas Style, 59, and Detective Sergeant John Donaldson, 57. They deny conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.
Mr Lawson said the prosecution alleged 'that these men put their heads together wickedly to mislead a court, a judge and a jury . . . for no reason at all'. But documents revealed during the current trial showed a 'mere fraction of the picture' had been put before the Court of Appeal.
The trial continues today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments