UK government to remove licensing requirements for landlords housing asylum seekers
Changes to allow landlords to house asylum seekers for two years without an HMO licence
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The government is planning to temporarily remove licensing requirements for asylum seeker accommodation as it attempts to move thousands out of hotels, in a move critics have warned will put their safety at risk.
The changes would allow landlords to house asylum seekers for two years without getting the property recognised as a House in Multiple Occupation (HMO).
The Guardian reported the plans would create exemptions from regulations governing electrical safety and minimum room sizes in such accommodation.
Housing minister Felicity Buchan told the Commons that the government had laid secondary legislation as “part of a broader suite of measures that the home office is implementing” to “speed up” the moving of asylum seekers out of hotels.
Almost 50,000 people are currently in hotels on top of approximately 57,000 in long-standing asylum accommodations.
LabourMPs condemned the plans, with Kim Leadbeater branding the statutory instrument “another clear example of the utter mess” the government has made of the immigration system and Matthew Pennycook warning it would mean “no minimum standards whatsoever” apply to asylum housing.
Mr Pennycook said: “Of course it will be cheaper to house asylum seekers in accommodation without gas safety certificates, without safe electrical appliances and furniture, without working smoke and carbon monoxide alarms and without shared amenity facilities that meet minimum standards.”
The Guardian quoted Mary Atkinson, campaigns and network manager at the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants, as saying: “Without HMO licences, already traumatised people will be at risk of living in places that are unfit for human habitation.”
The plans could be approved as soon as Wednesday, which will otherwise be dominated by the publication of the government’s long-awaited rental reforms to abolish so-called “no fault” evictions.
A government spokesman said: “The use of expensive hotels to house the unprecedented number of asylum seekers crossing the Channel is unacceptable and must end.
“By temporarily removing this licensing requirement, we will be able to acquire more suitable long-term accommodation while continuing to meet our legal duty of care.
“This will not compromise standards and all properties will be independently inspected for quality to ensure they continue to meet national housing quality requirements.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.