‘Profusion of officialdom’ in early days of pandemic, inquiry hears
Simon Ridley became the latest senior official to appear before Lady Hallett’s probe.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.There was a “profusion of officialdom” during the early period of the Government’s pandemic response, the Covid-19 inquiry has heard.
Simon Ridley, who became the latest senior official to appear before Lady Hallett’s probe this week, conceded that there were “too many meetings” inside the Cabinet Office during March and April 2020.
The former head of Cabinet Office Covid-19 Taskforce faced questions about preparations and plans to stop the spread of the virus in care homes and social care settings, as he acknowledged Downing Street and the Cabinet Office pushed the Department of Health to work on the issue.
I think that is true inside the Cabinet Office. I think it was also confusing for colleagues in other departments
Put to him by lead counsel for the inquiry Hugo Keith KC that there was a “profusion of officialdom” at the centre of Government, Mr Ridley agreed.
He told the hearing there were “too many meetings”.
“I think that is true inside the Cabinet Office. I think it was also confusing for colleagues in other departments.”
The official also said that by April “concerns were growing” about the situation inside care homes, but Mr Keith questioned him on whether protecting the NHS and freeing up beds in hospitals ultimately took precedence over where patients were sent.
He said: “That is precisely what the Government was balancing.
I think that is true inside the Cabinet Office. I think it was also confusing for colleagues in other departments
“It was the case that it was a priority for discharge to happen, and the MIG (ministerial implementation groups) discussions were about what the support and mitigations for care homes and the care sector were.
“There were some limitations to that in terms of testing capacity.”
He was also pressed on what Mr Keith called a “dawning realisation” that the testing system in practice could not keep up with the policy decision-making on who was going to be tested.
“In Cabinet Office and Number 10, we were not assured of the position in care homes and the extent to which there were plans in place to minimise the risks of infection.
“Testing was part of that, we were aware of constraints in testing, but there were other mitigations we were seeking to assure ourselves of,” Mr Ridley said.
Lord Edward Udny-Lister, a former Chief of Staff to Boris Johnson, appears on Tuesday afternoon.