Go-ahead given for scorpion pesticide
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.John Gummer, Secretary of State for the Environment, yesterday gave scientists permission to go ahead with the release in an Oxfordshire field of a genetically-engineered pesticide 'turbo- charged' with scorpion venom, writes Susan Watts.
The proposed release, first highlighted in the Independent, brought calls from some of the country's leading scientists for a delay in which its risk to the environment could be re-assessed.
Last week, the Government's Advisory Committee on Release to the Environment (Acre) looked again at the proposal and advised the Government that the test be allowed to go ahead as planned.
The experiment, by government scientists at the Institute of Virology and Environmental Microbiology, is now expected to begin in the next few days.
It involves a virus with added genetic material taken from scorpions. These added genes produce a powerful nerve poison which paralyses caterpillars so they stop feeding and the lethal virus can do its work.
The experiment was first recommended by Acre on 31 March as sufficiently safe to proceed. But detailed objections raised by some scientists came in too late to be taken into account.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments