Ghanaian murders report 'was unfair'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.COUNSEL for Ghana's head of national security yesterday accused the Independent of unfairness and bias in reporting an inquiry finding that Kojo Tsikata 'masterminded' the kidnap and murder of three of the country's high court judges, writes Mary Braid.
The newspaper reported that while Mr Tsikata was one of ten people recommended for prosecution by the special independent inquiry into the murders, no action was taken against him. Five of those named were executed.
At the High Court, Michael Tugendhat QC claimed the Independent's comments about Mr Tsikata, in a 1992 report on attempts to restore democracy in Ghana, had libelled his client. He said it failed to mention that the country's attorney-general had concluded there was no evidence against Mr Tsikata which would justify prosecution and that a man executed for the 1982 murders withdrew allegations implicating him before facing a firing squad.
Mr Tugendhat claimed that the story had implied that Mr Tsikata, right-hand man to Flight Lieutenant Jerry Rawlings, Ghana's military ruler, was guilty of murder and should have been prosecuted. But he claimed the case against his client had rested entirely on 'confused and contradictory' allegations, later retracted.
Mr Tugendhat said that Mr Tsikata's accuser had refused to repeat his allegations under oath.
The Independent denies libel and says its report was fair and accurate and covered by privilege. Richard Dowden, diplomatic editor, argued that it was right to give more weight to the findings of an inquiry led by a former chief justice. The case is due to end today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments