MP criticises claims Sir Jeffrey Donaldson considered UUP switch
East Belfast DUP MP Gavin Robinson said on Sunday he first became aware of the story earlier this week.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A DUP MP has branded as “nonsense” claims that Sir Jeffrey Donaldson contemplated rejoining the Ulster Unionists after failing in his initial bid to lead the party.
Earlier this week, DUP leader Sir Jeffrey said he would make no apology for engaging with other unionists.
Sir Jeffrey was addressing claims he was involved in discussions with Ulster Unionist Party leader Doug Beattie about potentially joining his party in May 2021 following his defeat in a DUP leadership contest.
The Lagan Valley MP, who weeks later ultimately became DUP leader when Edwin Poots was ousted after less than a month at the helm, has said he was approached by the UUP on the issue but insists he never had any intention of rejoining a party he left in 2003.
He has portrayed the exchange with the UUP as more of a conversation on achieving greater co-operation among unionists in Northern Ireland.
East Belfast MP Gavin Robinson said on Sunday that he first became aware of the story earlier this week.
He called it “nonsense news” and said it should not be a surprise that one unionist leader would sit down with another.
“This is irrelevant, historical tittle-tattle,” he told the BBC’s Sunday Politics programme.
He said unionism was more concerned about the upcoming crucial Assembly election.
“There is no public conversation about this whatsoever. The public could not give a toot.
“They want to see unionists working together … They are not delving back into tittle-tattle from 12 months ago.”
He admitted that last year was an “uncomfortable time” for his party, which faced serious internal divisions amid the ill-fated and short-lived period of the leadership of Mr Poots.
He categorically rejected suggestions that Sir Jeffrey contemplated forming a breakaway unionist party, fuelled by his failure to secure the DUP leadership at the first time of asking.
“This is a nonsense.
“People want to see a strong unionist support at this forthcoming election.”
The public, he said, was not interested in “revisionism” and he criticised reporting based on “anonymous sources”.