Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Food purists put genetics on menu

Susan Watts,Technology Correspondent
Friday 30 October 1992 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

GASTRONOMES could soon spot a small spiral symbol on the top of their menus if a campaign to boycott genetically engineered foods takes off in Britain as it has in America.

The Pure Food Campaign takes its logo from the double helix of the DNA molecule. The helix has a slash through it, and the words 'We don't serve genetically engineered food'.

The British campaign, to be launched over the next few months, will eventually target fast- food outlets, growers, suppliers, grocers and consumers.

The four-month-old US campaign has been orchestrated by Jeremy Rifkin, America's most vocal critic of biotechnology. Mr Rifkin is a controversial figure, variously described as a Luddite and a visionary. He heads a non- profit organisation, the Foundation on Economic Trends in Washington DC.

The foundation recently helped quash attempts to market bovine somato tropin, a drug that boosts milk production in cows.

Mr Rifkin objects to engineered food going on sale without pre- market testing for adverse reactions such as allergies.

'Our position is that you cannot know how that new gene is going to line up in its new host. Everybody has slight or serious allergenic responses - you can't test millions of people to find out what it is going to do. These food products are all novelties - you are starting from scratch,' he said yesterday at a London conference on animal genetics.

He also opposes the US government stance that genetically engineered foods need not be labelled. 'If we are labelling cosmetic changes to our food then we ought to label food that contains foreign genes. If you pluck a gene from a flounder fish and put it into a tomato to make it resistant to frost then people should know that is what they are eating.'

A second campaign is targeted at the McDonald's fast-food chain in an attempt to halve beef consumption. Campaigners plan to 'adopt-a-McDonald's'. They will give customers a second till receipt listing the environmental, human and animal health costs of the food they have bought as they leave the restaurants. (Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in