'Food miles' eat up money and energy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.BRITAIN is devoting increasing amounts of money, energy and road space to moving its food around, causing widespread social and environmental damage, according to a study published today.
Over the past 16 years, the distance travelled by food between farm, warehouse and shop has increased by half - but the amount carried is no greater than in 1978.
The study, by the Sustainable Agriculture, Food and Environment (Safe) alliance, a coalition of voluntary groups, is the first to survey comprehensively the growth in national and global supply lines that mean British supermarkets routinely airfreight fruit and vegetables from across the world, even when the same products are produced at home.
On supermarket shelves last month, for instance, were apples from the United States, which had travelled 4,700 miles, onions from Australia and New Zealand (12,000 miles), carrots from South Africa (5,100 miles) and green beans from Kenya (3,600 miles).
Food imports by air more than doubled during the Eighties and are still rising rapidly - by 15 per cent in the first half of this year, for example. Hugh Raven, coordinator of Safe, said it was 'madness to fly food halfway round the world when UK growers are going out of business'.
The report argues that the growth in long-distance transport of food benefits the supermarket chains but increases pollution. It is also bad for consumers: food quickly loses its nutrient value but many of the techniques and chemicals used to preserve it over long distances carry serious health risks, the report says.
The Food Miles Report: The dangers of long-distance food transport. The Safe Alliance, 38 Ebury Street, London SW1 W0LU; pounds 25.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments