Fathers suffer as CSA appeals lag
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Fathers appealing against awards made by the Child Support agency are having to wait an average of six months for a hearing, the watchdog body for tribunals complained yesterday.
The Council on Tribunals said the length of delays, which has steadily worsened, potentially cost men their homes because they had to keep paying maintenance pending the hearing. Lord Archer of Sandwell, chairman of the council, said the length of time it took for cases to be heard was due to delays within the CSA itself.
Almost half the 649 appeals which have been heard since the agency began work in April 1993 have found that the CSA was mistaken in its assessment and have reduced the payments.
Lord Archer, a QC and former Labour MP, speaking at a press conference in London to release the council's annual report, said: "If the CSA makes a mistake and somebody is over-assessed, he will have to continue to pay week after week.
"It might not seem a large sum of money to the people who decided the amount, but it adds up. By the time the appeal is heard, the man might be hopelessly in debt and it might be irretrievable. He might have had his house repossessed."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments