Father wins court battle with sect
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A FATHER yesterday won the right to keep his son away from the Exclusive Brethren - an isolationist religious sect that does everything possible to prevent its members having contact with the 'impure' outside world.
The Court of Appeal rejected an attempt by two members of the Christian fundamentalist group - a married couple regarded by the boy as his grandparents - to overturn a judge's order that he should live with his father.
The boy, referred to as 'D', has lived most of his life under the Brethrens' separatist regime, which bans all social contact with non-members, who are regarded as 'impure'. He, like other adherents, was prevented from taking meals with outsiders. Along with other children he had to eat separately from his schoolmates - even on outings - and could not watch television outside the classroom, listen to records or the radio, or use computers.
D's mother died of cancer in 1988. Later, his father had been ostracised from the Brethren and banned from socialising with his son after harrassing a female member of the sect.
The father later won county court orders that his son should live with him.
The county court judge rejected suggestions that the boy had been 'brainwashed' by the Brethren, but said the grandparents 'appear to lack any degree of charity towards D or his father'.
Lord Justice Purchas said the father had shown much more love and consideration for the child's feelings, and it was in the boy's best interests to remain with him.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments