Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Exam mark led to boy's suicide

Wednesday 21 April 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

(First Edition)

A SCHOOLBOY committed suicide after he failed to get full marks in a science exam, an inquest was told yesterday.

Michael Hearson, 15, electrocuted himself after spending hours studying the work of Michael Faraday, who discovered the induction of electric currents, the inquest in Nottingham heard.

The teenager was expecting a 100 per cent pass in a school exam and was distressed when he got only 70 per cent. He left a suicide note which read: 'I have grown to realise I am not intelligent enough for the life I wish to lead.'

His brother Howard, 21, who found him lying on the kitchen floor at their home in Sutton Bonington, Nottinghamshire, told the inquest: 'His face was blue and he was holding a wire connected to the wall.'

The coroner, Peter Jenkin-Jones, recorded a verdict that Michael took his own life.

After the inquest Michael's father, Ronald Hearson, 62, said: 'Michael's ambition was to become a top scientist. Nothing less than 100 per cent would do and although he got 70 per cent, he still felt he was a failure.'

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in