Eton wins rowing lake battle
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ETON College has won an 11- year battle with Buckinghamshire residents over plans to create a 2,000-metre rowing lake on green belt land, writes Fran Abrams.
The college wants to extract 3.5 million tons of gravel from fields near the Thames at Dorney to protect its pupils from the dangers of rowing on the overcrowded river.
John Gummer, the Secretary of State for the Environment, yesterday overturned a county council decision to reject the scheme. He said it would create a national sporting asset for use by other local schools and the national rowing squad. Over half the nation's rowers live in the Thames Valley.
The college first applied for planning permission for the lake in 1983. The cost of the 10- year project would be offset by proceeds from the sale of the gravel, currently pounds 6 per ton.
Both residents and the council objected on the grounds that it would cause disruption and environmental damage. The case went to a planning appeal in May 1993, resulting in victory for Eton.
A spokesman for Buckinghamshire County Council said that it was disappointed by the decision but would co-operate 'to ensure that people who live in the area will be disturbed as little as possible'.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments