Dame Esther Rantzen: I would like champagne and caviar before Dignitas death
Dame Esther Rantzen signed up for an assisted dying clinic after being diagnosed with terminal cancer.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Dame Esther Rantzen has revealed she would like a final dinner of caviar and champagne before her death after she signed up for an assisted dying clinic.
Since being diagnosed with terminal cancer in 2023, Dame Esther has campaigned for a parliamentary debate and a free vote to legalise assisted dying with ābuilt-in precautions to protect the interests of the personā.
The 83-year-old founder of Childline joined the Swiss-assisted dying company, Dignitas, as a precautionary measure āif the law does not change in timeā.
Speaking to LBC on Monday, Dame Esther outlined her preparations for her death should she go ahead with Dignitas.
She said: āIād like to fly off to Zurich with my nearest and dearest. Have a fantastic dinner the night before. Iād love caviar, if possible, and the fact that it doesnāt always agree with me doesnāt matter, does it?
āI could even have champagne, which Iām deeply allergic to. Then the next day, go to this rather unappealing place where they do it.
āListen to a favourite piece of music, say goodbye to everybody. Tell them to cheer up. Iām meeting my late husband, my departed dog and my mother at the pearly gates.
āHold up my hand for an injection or open my mouth for a rather disgusting medication.
āIāve got an amazing family and a group of friends and colleagues. So Iād like to say goodbye fairly gracefully, as much as I can muster, and then go, thatās what Iād like.ā
Dame Esther, from Berkhamsted, Hertfordshire, said the laws surrounding assisted dying are a āmess at the momentā as her family could be accused of murder if they travelled with her to Dignitas.
The former journalist and television presenter emphasised the importance of āindividual choiceā if her suffering from cancer becomes ātoo greatā.
āThe intentions are goodā¦ to protect people in the last days of their life, from being coerced into something by greedy relatives, or other crimes of that kind,ā she said.
āAs I have terminal cancer, it is a possibility that my life will become too painful, that my suffering will be too great.
āEven with the great palliative care skills that exist in this country and in my local hospice they wonāt be able to help me and I want to die.
āWhat we need is for people to have individual choice, at that moment, which is literally life and death.
Dame Esther, along with the Daily Express and the campaign group Dignity in Dying, launched a petition demanding a parliamentary vote on the subject, which amassed 120,000 signatures in about three weeks.
Sarah Wootton, chief executive of Dignity in Dying, told the PA news agency: āDame Esther Rantzen speaks for countless families up and down the country, from all walks of life, who are demanding change.
āUnder the current law, dying people are forced to choose between suffering, suicide or Switzerland. From countries that have already legalised like Australia and New Zealand, we know that there is a better, kinder, safer way. Assisted dying would only be available to terminally ill people with mental capacity, subject to assessment by two independent doctors.
āIt is clear that it is time for a free and fair debate on assisted dying, but the law will not change unless the next Government commits to making Parliamentary time for this issue. Nowhere is the personal more political than in matters of life and death. The next election needs to count for dying Britons and party leaders should prioritise a debate on assisted dying.ā
Dr Gordon Macdonald, chief executive officer of the campaign group Care Not Killing, who opposes assisted dying, told the PA: āChanging the law to legalise assisted suicide or euthanasia in the UK would represent a dramatic change in how doctors and nurses treat and care for people.
āIt would also place huge pressure, real or perceived on terminally ill and disabled people to end their lives exactly as we see in the handful of places that have legalised assisted suicide or euthanasia.
āIt is disappointing at a time when we have seen widespread discrimination against the elderly and disabled people.
āAlong with a crisis in the NHS, the care system and with hospices across the UK facing a Ā£50 million shortfall that we continue to ignore, the more important debate is how to extend high-quality palliative care to all those who need it.ā