Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Eight-year road ban for duke: Peer is spared jail after fifth drink-drive offence

James Cusick
Thursday 17 June 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE DUKE of Hamilton, Scotland's premier peer, was banned from driving for eight years yesterday after being convicted of his fifth drink-driving offence, writes James Cusick.

The duke, who is also the Hereditary Keeper of the Palace of Holyrood in Edinburgh, was three times over the legal drink-driving alcohol limit when he evaded police in a car chase, at speeds of up to 95 mph, on 20 December last year.

Police said lives had been in danger as the 54-year-old duke sped through villages during the chase around Haddington. He accelerated through police road blocks, eventually crashing into a road sign at high speed.

At Haddington Sheriff Court in East Lothian yesterday in addition to the driving ban the duke was sentenced to 12 month's probation and 200 hours community service.

With custodial sentences almost uniformly imposed in such extreme circumstances, the court's decision was criticised for exposing 'one law for the aristocracy and another for everyone else'.

Adrian Davies, director of the Glasgow Council on Alcohol, a voluntary agency which campaigns against alcohol misuse and offers counselling, said the sentence was 'just not right'.

Mr Davies said there was no excuse for the duke's behaviour and it should have been dealt with as a serious offence. 'If that involves a custodial sentence, so be it.'

In court, Raymond Fraser, for the duke, said: 'It is perhaps difficult for people who work hard and play hard not to do things to excess.'

He told Sheriff John Dean that on the same evening of the incident the duke had been taken to Edinburgh Royal Infirmary with a suspected heart attack. As a result, he had no recall of what happened later. On being apprehended he had knocked off a policeman's helmet and spectacles.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in