Heads have ‘duty’ to drive absent pupils to school if necessary – Keegan
Pupil absences are at ‘crisis’ level, the Education Secretary has said.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Pupil absences are at “crisis” level, the Education Secretary has said, as she endorsed headteachers driving children to school if necessary.
Gillian Keegan told Sky News that headteachers have a “duty” to get children to school.
Figures released earlier this year showed that around 125,000 pupils last year were severely absent, effectively meaning they were absent more often than they were in classrooms.
Ms Keegan, who rejected the suggestion that the Government did not have a grip on the problem, was asked about examples of headteachers driving to children’s homes to pick them up and bring them to school.
I have a number of headteachers who work with me on policy and sometimes you just have to do that - sometimes you have to go or you have to text the parent in the morning... you do whatever is possible
“They have a duty,” she said.
“We all have to play our part.
“I have a number of headteachers who work with me on policy and sometimes you just have to do that – sometimes you have to go or you have to text the parent in the morning… you do whatever is possible.”
Pressed on whether that was a good use of headteachers’ time, Ms Keegan said: “It is a good use to have all kids in school.
“That’s not what we want headteachers doing all of their days. But to be honest, right now, if that works to get somebody in school, it’s worth it.”
The matter has become a particular concern in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic, which saw schools close and students left learning from home for significant spells.
Last month, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said that children missing school was a “tragedy” and “incredibly damaging for educational outcomes”.
But school leaders described the comments as “unhelpful”.
James Bowen, assistant general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, said: “These comments are unhelpful and demonstrate a worrying lack of understanding of how schools operate.
While schools clearly have an important role to play in supporting good attendance, we should not lose sight of the basic reality that bringing children to school on time is the role of parents
“School leaders quite obviously need to be in school leading their schools – asking them to drive around the local area collecting children is not practical, nor would it be a good use of their time.
“For many years schools had local authority teams employed to do exactly this job, but we have seen them largely disappear after a decade of cuts.
“While schools clearly have an important role to play in supporting good attendance, we should not lose sight of the basic reality that bringing children to school on time is the role of parents.”
Downing Street said “different schools will take different approaches” to the issue.
“It is right that of course headteachers are proactive in tackling this and indeed the vast majority do an excellent job in ensuring all children are regularly attending school,” the Prime Minister’s official spokesman said.