Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey proposes doubling levy on online gaming
The MP suggested a change to Remote Gaming Duty.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey has proposed doubling the tax levied on profits from online gaming.
The MP suggested a change to Remote Gaming Duty as a potential “alternative” to some of the tax rises that were announced by the Chancellor on Wednesday.
Remote Gaming Duty is a tax charged on gaming provider profits “from remote gaming” such as those played online, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility.
From April 2019 it has been levied at 21%.
Addressing a lunch with members of the parliamentary press gallery in Westminster on Thursday, Sir Ed said: “In constituencies across the country there’s an epidemic of problem gambling, it’s a real social issue, and many people have been analysing it and thinking about it.”
A report from the Social Market Foundation think tank earlier in October made the case for doubling the tax from its current level to “at least” 42%.
“I would have thought a government who wants to tackle our social problems would have taken their idea, which is to double the duty,” Sir Ed said.
The party leader claimed that “if you double remote gaming duty, and I now propose it, you would get up to £900 million.
“You wouldn’t have to have this inheritance tax hit for farms, for example.”
Sir Ed also confirmed that his party would be voting against the changes to inheritance tax announced in Wednesday’s fiscal statement.
“We’re going to vote against it,” he told the event.
Rachel Reeves announced on Wednesday that from April 2026, the first £1 million of combined business and agricultural assets will continue to attract no inheritance tax.
But for assets over £1 million, inheritance tax will apply with 50% relief at an effective rate of 20%.
Sir Ed said he thinks the changes show “a huge lack of understanding of rural communities” and claimed the plan “doesn’t raise very much money”.
He described farmers as having had a “really really tough period” in recent years, and predicted that some will be “really alarmed” by the proposal.
Earlier on Thursday, shadow business secretary Kevin Hollinrake told the Commons that farmers could have to stump up hundreds of thousands as a result of the changes.
The Conservative MP said: “Their choice was to hit businesses and that’s because there’s not an ounce of business experience amongst any of them. Labour’s death taxes will hit farms and businesses.
“Families with a typical farm will have to fund hundreds of thousands of pounds or see their farms broken up and sold.”